Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hooper v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 6:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Dennis Russell Hooper
Defendant:
North Bend/Coos-Curry Housing Authority and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bray v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2016cv01980
Defendant:
Alaska USA Federal Credit Union, American Airlines and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. Marion County Housing Authority et al
as 3:2016cv01854
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
MCHA:
Marion County Housing Authority
HUD:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Bray v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Adam Bray
Defendant:
City of Cannon Beach, City of Gearhart, City of Seaside and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
McVick LLC v. HUD
as 6:2012cv01644
Plaintiff:
JDV Corp. and McVick LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Henderson v. HMB Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
Jason Henderson
Defendant:
HMB Inc. and Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bronaugh Investors Oregon, Limited Partnership v. Bakke Property Management et al
as 3:2007cv00359
Plaintiff:
Bronaugh Investors Oregon, Limited Partnership and Bakke Property Management
Defendant:
Oregon Housing and Community Services, State of Oregon, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
