Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HAWKINS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03859
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER
Plaintiff:
CARLTON HAWKINS and MICHELLE A HAWKINS
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY INC, DEPUY INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BENNETT et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01370
Plaintiff:
DONALD BENNETT and NITA LATTEN
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and CHESAPEAKE SURGICAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOLBERG v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., et al
as 1:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY VOLBERG
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY, INC., DEPUY INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FOLLIARD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01742
Plaintiff:
THOMAS B. FOLLIARD and ANN HOWARD FOLLIARD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. , DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. and CHESAPEAKE SURGICAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BERTOLOTTI v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01630
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA BERTOLOTTI
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01444
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HUNT v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
as 1:2003cv00900
Plaintiff:
MARLA HUNT
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLARO v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
as 1:2008cv01305
Plaintiff:
MARION CLARO and MARION CLARO
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. and DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
