Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PETERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07301
Plaintiff:
DEREK PETERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Hanif v. Simon et al
as 2:2020cv01010
Defendant:
Joseph Ackers and Derek Peter Simon
Plaintiff:
Raheem Ahmed Hanif
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Gohde et al
as 2:2017cv01170
Plaintiff:
Cody Michael Roberts
Defendant:
J Gohde , Derek Peters, CO Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kartiganer v. Newman, et al
as 11-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM KARTIGANER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE NEWMAN, in his Official Capacity of Sheriff of Huerfano County, Colorado, LARRY BALDONADO, in his Official Capacity of Police Chief of Walsenburg, Colorado, DEREK PETERS, in his Official Capacity of Police Officer of Walsenburg, Colorado and others
Defendant:
HUERFANO COUNTY, COLORADO, CITY OF WALSENBURG, COLORADO, LEE ALLEN HAWKE, in his Official Capacity of District Attorney for the 3rd District of Colorado and others
Griffiths et al v. Lake Austin Properties I, Ltd.
as 6:2010cv01242
Plaintiff:
Carl Griffiths , Diane Louise Griffiths , Derek Peter Smith and others
Defendant:
Lake Austin Properties I, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Griffiths et al v. Maesbury Homes, Inc.
as 6:2010cv01240
Plaintiff:
Carl Griffiths , Diane Louise Griffiths , Derek Peter Smith and others
Defendant:
Maesbury Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Kartiganer v. Newman et al
as 1:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Adam Kartiganer
Defendant:
Bruce Newman, Larry Baldonado, Derek Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 0:2008cv04717
Plaintiff:
Arnold Johnson and Arnold Johnson
Defendant:
Derek Peters, Jeremiah Lund, Louis Bunde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
