Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mahmoud v. Akima Global Sevices LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Physicians, Akima Global Services, LLC, Detention Center Officer Captain Vohwinkel and others
Plaintiff:
Munther Mahmoud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Givens v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor P. Mason, Hinds County, Mississippi and Detention Officers John Does 1-6
Plaintiff:
Darion Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal, Jr. v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00590
Plaintiff:
Melvin Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor P. Mason, Hinds County, Mississippi and Detention Officers John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2018cv02918
Defendant:
Detention Officer John Doe 1 and Harris Conty Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
G'Cobra Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahmoud v. Akima Global Services, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00485
Defendant:
Akima Global Services, LLC, Akima Logistics Services, LLC, Michael T. Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Munther Mahmoud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. The City of Yonkers, et al
as 1:2012cv03802
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez
Defendant:
Police Officer Crane, Yonkers Police Detention Officer Wanderman, Yonkers Police Detective John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison et al v. Harford County, MD et al
as 1:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Anthony Madison , Moses P. Madison , Kim Satchell and others
Defendant:
Harford County, MD , Sheriff Jesse Bane , Deputy John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maricopa County et al
as 2:2009cv01571
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
