Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Devin Wade v. M. Siddiqui

as 5:2024cv01665
Defendant:
M. Siddiqui
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Wade v. Administration for Children and Families

as 5:2024cv01666
Defendant:
Administration for Children and Families
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Kyle Wade v. Central District of California
as 5:2024cv01765
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Respondent:
Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devin Wade v. Stodghill K Bryan et al
as 5:2024cv01636
Defendant:
Judge Stodghill K Bryan
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Kyle Wade v. Central District of California
as 2:2024cv07319
Respondent:
Central District of California
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Devin Wade v. CACD Central District of California
as 2:2024cv07321
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Respondent:
CACD Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devin Wade v. Michael A. Hestrin
as 5:2024cv01647
Defendant:
Michael A. Hestrin
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Wade v. Custom Houses of America et al
as 5:2024cv01577
Defendant:
U.S. Custom House New Orleans, U.S. Custom House Charleston, U.S. Custom House and Post Office Cincinnati and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Wade v. Minister Ricardo Lorenzetti
as 5:2024cv01638
Defendant:
Minister Ricardo Lorenzetti
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Wade v. European Public Prosecutors Office
as 5:2024cv01489
Defendant:
European Public Prosecutors Office
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.