Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Devin Wade v. Stodghill K Bryan et al
as 5:2024cv01636
Defendant:
Judge Stodghill K Bryan
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Wade v. Custom Houses of America et al
as 5:2024cv01577
Defendant:
U.S. Custom House New Orleans, U.S. Custom House Charleston, U.S. Custom House and Post Office Cincinnati and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Kyle Wade v. Central District of California
as 5:2024cv01563
Respondent:
Central District of California
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devin Wade v. Ministry of Justice UAE
as 5:2024cv01503
Defendant:
Ministry of Justice UAE
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Wade v. Capitol Hill
as 5:2024cv01498
Defendant:
Capitol Hill
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Wade v. Boarder Patrol
as 5:2024cv01490
Defendant:
Boarder Patrol
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Wade v. Supreme Court of California
as 5:2024cv01497
Defendant:
Supreme Court of California
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Wade v. Attorney General Office
as 5:2024cv01487
Defendant:
Attorney General Office
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Wade v. European Public Prosecutors Office
as 5:2024cv01489
Defendant:
European Public Prosecutors Office
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devin Wade v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts
as 5:2024cv01465
Defendant:
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
Plaintiff:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
