Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12134 Americans with Disabilities Act (IDEA) Education
ANDREWS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv02340
Plaintiff:
DIANE ANDREWS and THE ESTATE OF BERNICE BLACK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frazier v. Adams et al
as 3:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Defendant:
Adams, S. Wilson, Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Diane Andrews, S. B. Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpkins v. Andrews et al
as 3:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
Dian Andrews, John Doe Rossitter, John Doe Landrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Dusty Ray Spencer
Defendant:
Julie Jones, S. Soud, Diane Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpkins v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
John Doe Brown, John Doe Robinson, John Doe Landrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamze v. Braden et al
as 3:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Defendant:
D. W. Braden, Gilick, Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamze v. Braden et al
as 3:2016cv01217
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Defendant:
D. W. Braden, Gilick, Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv01015
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Kevin D. Jordan, J. H. Yonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
