Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Diana Robinson v. Taser International, Inc.
as 24-10428
Plaintiff:
TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Other:
DIANA ROBINSON
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Robinson v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06569
Plaintiff:
Diana Robinson
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC, LOreal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harvey et al v. Robinson
as 4:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Harvey and Tristan Harvey
Defendant:
Diana Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Diana Robinson
as 22-10949
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANA ROBINSON
Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Phazzer Electronics, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv01721
Defendant:
Steven Abboud, Diana Robinson, Phazzer Federal Supply and others
Plaintiff:
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
TASER International, Inc. v. Phazzer Electronics, Inc.
as 19-2115
Petitioner / Appellant:
DIANA ROBINSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PHAZZER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Lawrence Hogan, Tom Lewis, Nina Diana Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Robinson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12051
Plaintiff:
Diana Robinson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taser International, Inc. v. Phazzer Electronics, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00366
Defendant:
Phazzer Electronics, Inc, Steven Abboud, Phazzer Global LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Taser International, Inc.
Petitioner:
Diana Robinson, Adam R. Stephenson and Steve Abboud
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
