Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1416
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 22-275
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee: DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor: James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Canfield v. SS&C Technologies Holdings, In
as 21-3086
Plaintiff / Appellant: Latrecia Onunkwor, individually and individually and for her individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, David Ostermeyer, individually and individually and for his individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, Diana Weaver, individually and individually and for her individual account damages on behalf of the DST SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc., DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant: Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and John Does, 1-20
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 21-3066
Plaintiff: Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee: DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor: James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Canfield v. Ferguson
as 21-2110
Petitioner: Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz, Latrecia Onunkwor and others
Respondent: Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat, Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. v. Payne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv11297
Nominal Defendant: Deborah A. Smith, DST Systems, Inc., Myrl C. Jeffcoat and others
Plaintiff: Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc.
Defendant: Percy Payne, Brenda Keeton, Kathleen Moerschel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv04951
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canfield et al v. SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv08913
Plaintiff: Diana Weaver, Robert Canfield, Latrecia Onunkwor and others
Defendant: SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc., DST Systems, Inc., John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Ferguson et al v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06685
Defendant: Lowell L. Bryan, Jude C. Metcalfe, George L. Argyros and others
Plaintiff: Deborah Smith, Michael L. Ferguson and Myrl C. Jeffcoat
Intervenor Plaintiff: Stephanie Ostrander and James Ducharme
3Rd Party Defendant: Robert D Goldfarb
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Acting Sec. of Labor Milton Al Stewart
Interested Party: U.S. Sec'y of L Eugene Scalia and Martin J. Walsh
Intervenor: Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz, Latrecia Onunkwor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06531
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?