Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Simpson v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Diane Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Simpson, Sr., et al v. City of Tampa et al
as 8:2018cv01780
Defendant:
State of Florida, Dick Greco, Jr. and City of Tampa
Plaintiff:
Winifred Diane Simpson and Jennell Lavar Simpson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07689
Plaintiff:
Diane Simpson
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14450
Plaintiff:
Diane Simpson
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Colvin et. al.
as 1:2016cv11056
Plaintiff:
Diane Simpson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams, et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv06752
Plaintiff:
Gregory Adams , Richard Balogh , Harland Bates and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Angela Simpson
as 14-4882
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGELA DIANE SIMPSON
MOHSSENI et al v. WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF OHIO et al
as 2:2014cv05285
Plaintiff:
HAMID MOHSSENI , KIMBERLY DIANE SIMPSON-MOHSSENI and CARSON'S STEAK WAREHOUSE, INC
Defendant:
WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF OHIO, JOHN J. KORESKO, V, LAWRENCE KORESKO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
