Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Diane Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Drake v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv02636
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, Frederick W. Smith, Molly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Smith
as 1:2016mc00098
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Monica Diane Smith
USA v. Smith et al
as 6:2014cv00045
Defendant:
Diane Smith, Unknown Spouse of Diane Smith and Commonwealth Credit Union, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Koonce et al v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Koonce , Duane Miller , Joseph Coniglio and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. , CHK Utica, L.L.C. , Sharon Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp23046
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Smith and Diane Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carmichael v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv14771
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Nick Ludwick, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated and others
Washington v. Hutchinson et al
as 5:2008cv12787
Plaintiff:
Clarence Washington
Defendant:
Craig Hutchinson, George Pramstaller, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. Vargas et al
as 7:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
Johnny Davis
Defendant:
U. Vargas, F. T. Leibel, R. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
