Cases 1 - 10 of 4,490
Kramer v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Kramer
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez-Guzman, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2534
Petitioner:
MARTHA ELIZABETH JIMENEZ-GUZMAN and SAMUEL ANDRES DIAZ-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bernardino v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2536
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO BERNARDINO, JR.
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR RALPH DIAZ, Warden TAMMY FOSS, THOMAS, (Captain) and others
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diaz v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Pricilla Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Group Fifty Eight LLC v. Mercedes Ramirez et al
as 2:2024cv02712
Plaintiff:
Group Fifty Eight LLC
Defendant:
Mercedes Ramirez, Steven Martinez, Marizza Garcia and others
Interested Party:
Juan Diaz
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
