Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Guyton v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
Taufano CT Guyton
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath, Mike Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Derrick V Newton, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherfield et al v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sherfield, Sr, Leslie R Loyd, Taufano CT Guyton and others
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loyd v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
Leslie Rashad Loyd
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Diaz
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gray v. Diaz-Ramirez et al
as 4:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Brett W Gray
Defendant:
Rafael Diaz-Ramirez and Blits Med LLC d/b/a Blits Med Trucking and Logistics, a California Corporation - Blits Med Trucking and Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Accident Insurance Company Inc v. Elite Interiors Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Elite Interiors Inc, Christina Cuellar Diaz, Armando Cuellar-Marin and others
Plaintiff:
Accident Insurance Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
