Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diebold Incorporated et al v. QSI, Inc.
as 5:2016cv02481
Plaintiff:
Diebold Incorporated and Diebold Self-Service Systems
Defendant:
QSI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Diebold Incorporated v. Provident Credit Union
as 5:2016cv01355
Plaintiff:
Diebold Incorporated
Defendant:
Provident Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diebold, Incorporated et al v. Nautilus Hyosung Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02153
Plaintiff:
Diebold, Incorporated and Diebold Self-Service Systems
Defendant:
Nautilus Hyosung Inc. and Nautilus Hyosung America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Diebold Incorporated et al v. Cook Security Group, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00783
Plaintiff:
Diebold Incorporated and Diebold Self-Service Systems
Defendant:
Cook Security Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Diebold Incorporated et al v. NuSource Financial Inc.
as 5:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Diebold Incorporated and Diebold Self-Service Systems
Defendant:
NuSource Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Diebold Incorporated v. PPS Data, LLC
as 5:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Diebold Incorporated
Defendant:
PPS Data, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Diebold, Incorporated v. Capital Security Systems, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Diebold, Incorporated
Defendant:
Capital Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Parr v. Diebold Incorporated
as 5:2009cv01041
Plaintiff:
Michele B. Parr
Defendant:
Diebold Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Voting Solutions, Inc. v. Diebold Incorporated et al
as 5:2009cv00956
Plaintiff:
Voting Solutions, Inc. and Voting Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Diebold Incorporated and Premier Election Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ATM Exchange, Inc. v. Diebold, Incorporated
as 5:2007mc00042
Petitioner:
ATM Exchange, Inc., ATM Exchange, Inc. and ATM Exchange, Inc.
Respondent:
Diebold, Incorporated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.