Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-6232
Petitioner:
ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO, JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2947
Petitioner:
JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO, ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sandoval-Cho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2252
Petitioner:
MYLVIA SACELA SANDOVAL-CHO and DIEGO ALEXANDER MELCHOR-SANDOVAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pacific Financial Association, Inc. v. Alexander
as 4:2022cv03919
Plaintiff:
Pacific Financial Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Diego Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ALVARADO REYES v. Garland
as 22-6219
Petitioner:
MARIA EDITH ALVARADO REYES, YENNY ANTONIA REYES REYES and DIEGO ALEXANDER REYES REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diego Jorge-Ticum v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60567
Petitioner:
DIEGO ALEXANDER JORGE-TICUM
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Magdalena Suastes Calderon, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-3649
Petitioner:
MAGDALENA SUASTES CALDERON, DIEGO ALEXANDER SUASTES CALDERON and BRITANI YERANIA FLORES SUASTES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General
Magdalena Suastes Calderon, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60436
Petitioner:
MAGDALENA SUASTES CALDERON, DIEGO ALEXANDER SUASTES CALDERON and BRITANI YERANIA FLORES SUASTES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Domingo Cornejo-Sanchez, et al v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73052
Petitioner:
DOMINGO ERNESTO CORNEJO-SANCHEZ and DIEGO ALEXANDER CORNEJO-LOPEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Diego Rodriguez-Lopez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-11771
Petitioner:
DIEGO ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
