Cases 1 - 10 of 834
Amy Henson v. Walker County, et al
as 23-11821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY HENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WALKER COUNTY, LARRY UNDERWOOD, SHERIFF, WALKER COUNTY and others
Shuler v. City of Hinesville et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Melodie V Shuler
Defendant:
City of Hinesville, Mayor Allen Brown, Assistant Mayor Ruan Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Dill v. AEGIS Defense Services LLC
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert S Dill
Defendant:
AEGIS Defense Services LLC doing business as Gardaworld Federal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Robert S Dill
Defendant:
AEGIS Defense Services LLC d/b/a Gardaworld Federal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Frazier v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Sgt. Knight, Derrick Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11169
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DILLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Dill et al
as 4:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Dill, Isaac Wade, Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Dill v. United States
as 23-1801
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Eugene Dill
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Moore v. Dowies et al
as 5:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Cedre Moore
Defendant:
Sam Dowies, Dusty Williams and Keith Dill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
