Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Gu v. Chen
as 25-680
Plaintiff:
FEIFEI GU
Defendant:
HANG CHEN, EMILY HUI CHEN-LIANG, SUSANA CHONG CHEN and others
Djelosevic et al v. DiMaggio et al
as 1:2025cv01011
Plaintiff:
Ramazan Djelosevic and Mirsade Djelosevic
Defendant:
Roy DiMaggio and RSD 4th Avenue LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dimaggio v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv01562
Plaintiff:
Lushaunda N. Dimaggio
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HAMPTON v. WEIS et al
as 4:2024cv00158
Defendant:
BRIAN WEIS, ROSS DIMAGGIO and P. KELLEY DUNNE
Plaintiff:
JASON HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PETERS et al
as 1:2024cv10640
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PAULETTE PETERS and LINDA DIMAGGIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Lee v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02049
Defendant:
Joseph Peter Lopinto, III, Cody Pittman, Unidentified Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv04756
Defendant:
252685 ST LLC, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals, Complaint THE LLC D/B/A. Xiao Guo Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv04612
Defendant:
252685 ST LLC, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals, Erik Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dimaggio-Bouley v. United States Of America et al
as 7:2024cv03789
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
DONNA DIMAGGIO-BOULEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
Saloj Monroy v. Piz-Zetta LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Saloj Monroy
Defendant:
Piz-Zetta LLC and Anthony Dimaggio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
