Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Rike v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Medical Dept., Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, UTMB Legal Department and others
Plaintiff:
James E Rike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsay et al v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Head Warden Damon Andrews, Former Head Warden Felipe Gonzalez and Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Lindsay and Michael Joseph Bien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffield v. Abbott et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Dale Wainwright, Warden Bridgette Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman Coffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozano v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, COV Tammie W Jefferson, Captain Leonard R Jones, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Demond Lozano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sophus v. Collier
as 4:2020cv01086
Petitioner:
Clyde Eugene Sophus
Respondent:
Dir. of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orr v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Sgt T Williams, Warden James Danheim and others
Plaintiff:
Kendra Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Brittney Tilley, Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Robert Herrero and others
Plaintiff:
William Shane Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Wainwright et al
as 4:2019cv04538
Plaintiff:
Antonio Q McGee
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Dale Wainwright and Pamela Thickle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Davis
as 4:2019cv03875
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier
Petitioner:
Paul Edward Neal
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Collier
as 4:2019cv03800
Respondent:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Freddie Robin Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
