Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Carpenter v. Caceres et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael W Carpenter, Sr.
Defendant:
Luis Taveras Caceres, Bennie Juarez, III, Sandra L Germany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv01725
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jane Doe Williams, Jane Doe Ervin and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie James Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv04390
Defendant:
Officer Lanika Thomas, Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Jacqueline Lofton and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rike v. Collier
as 3:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier
Plaintiff:
James E Rike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03228
Plaintiff:
Leslie Jones
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis, Asst. Warden Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomeli v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv02942
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis and Sr. Warden Blake Lamb
Plaintiff:
Enrique R Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles A Lott v. Abbott et al
as 4:2020cv02954
Defendant:
UTMB Health Department, Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Warden R Herrera and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Collier
as 2:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Bryan Collier, Billy Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
John Henry Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Collier et al
as 6:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Bill Baker
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Faye Wright, Patrick Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Abbott et al
as 4:2020cv02393
Defendant:
UTMB Health, Governor Greg Abbott, Dir of TDCJ Exec. Di Bryan Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
