Cases 1 - 10 of 9,998
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00174
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kersh v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00845
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Laderris Eugene Kersh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wild v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00800
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Craig Merlin Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00806
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Garrison Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00808
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Ivan E. Holbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enriquez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00454
Defendant:
FNU Alexander, Mail Room Off or Staff, FNU Adabola and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv03256
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Bailey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Espinoza v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02245
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Alejandro Luna Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Douglas Eric Hill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
John A. Grimes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
