Cases 1 - 10 of 9,750
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00600
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Foster, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Eddie R. Sosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02662
Petitioner:
Bryan K Lynch
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Board of Pardons and Paroles, S Holomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02661
Petitioner:
Rickey L McGee
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
Ernest L. Brown
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02598
Petitioner:
Herbert Lavonne Wiggins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Charles L. Franklin
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
