Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Glimp v. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02708
Plaintiff: Thomas Madison Glimp
Defendant: Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security, The and Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Washington, et al v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35391
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls, CORDELL HULL, BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: FREDRIC'S ARMS & SMITHS, LLC and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant: United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
Robert Thorne, et al v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17606
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, MIKE MILLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: G AND D GROUP, DAVE SHEER GUNS, DIPLOPOINT and others
Thorne et al v. U.S. Department of State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01982
Defendant: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. Department of State and others
Plaintiff: Southern Arms, Barbara J. Dennysschen, Robert D. Thorne and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Stagg P.C. v. United States Department of St We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-811
Defendant / Appellee: Michael Pompeo, in his official capacity only as Secretary of State, United States Department of State and Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
Plaintiff / Appellant: Stagg P.C.
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01115
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State, Sarah Heidema and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, Electronic Frontier Foundation and The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Interested Party: Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5034
Plaintiff - Appellant: Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of State, John F. Kerry, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?