Cases 31 - 40 of 46
PJY Enterprises, LLC et al v. Kaneshiro et al
as 1:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
PJY Enterprises, LLC , Lucky G Enterprises, Inc. , S L & G Investments, LLC and others
Defendant:
Keith M. Kaneshiro , Louis M. Kealoha , Honolulu Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lindsey et al v. Matayoshi et al
as 1:2011cv00713
Plaintiff:
Heather Lindsey , Geremy K. Lopez and RFL
Defendant:
Kathryn S. Matayoshi, Kanu O Ka Aina New Century Public Charter School, Pat Bergin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
Robin Alexander
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, Honolulu Police Department, Winston C. W. Leong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
