Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Middleton v. Amentum Government Services Parent Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02456
Plaintiff:
Jay Middleton
Defendant:
Amentum Government Services Parent Holdings, LLC, Amentum Benefits Administration Committee, Tammy Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Topeka Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2018cv02216
Plaintiff:
Sara Loretta Cook
Defendant:
Topeka Correctional Facility , Kansas Department of Corrections , Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LHF Productions v. Does 1-30
as 2:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions
Defendant:
Does 1-30
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
LHF Productions v. Does 1-30
as 2:2016cv01007
Plaintiff:
LHF Productions
Defendant:
Does 1-30
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Ford v. USA et al
as 6:2015cv00305
Plaintiff:
Norma Christine Ford
Defendant:
John Does 1-30 and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henre et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Henre, Sr. and Wilma K. Henre
Defendant:
Jason Allen, William Bais, B. Bunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes, et al v. United States, et al
as 13-5014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY WAYNE BARNES, SR. and LINDA SUE BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE, sued as: John Does 1-30, unknown individuals of the Tulsa Police Department and/or BATF and John Does 31-40, unknown supervisors and/or policy makers for the Tulsa Police Department and/or BATF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
