Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant:
RODNEY BALLARD, Commissioner, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant:
RODNEY BALLARD, Commissioner, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 21-5628
Defendant:
BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, JACK GODBEY, Unit II Unit Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer and STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator
Michael Eaves v. Rodney Ballard, et al
as 20-5277
Defendant:
BRANDON LYNCH, Administrative Specialist, JOHN M. DUNN, Ombudsman, JACK GODBEY, Unit II Unit Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EAVES
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN TOELKE, Classification and Treatment Officer, STEFANEY HUGHES, Unit 1 Administrator and EARL WALLS, Unit 1 Assistant Unit Administrator
Marcus BrittIn re: Marcus Britt
as 20-5239
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS BRITT
Respondent:
DON BOTTOM, Warden
Jonathan Johnson v. Don Bottom
as 19-5107
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN L. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DON BOTTOM
Moore v. Bottom
as 3:2018cv00200
Petitioner:
Keith K. Moore
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hammond v. Bottom
as 3:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joshua T. Hammond
Defendant:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanfill v. Bottom
as 5:2017cv00151
Petitioner:
Charles Stanfill
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
