Cases 1 - 10 of 144
James Munson v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 14-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, DONALD GAETZ, Warden/Administrative Officer, Menard Correctional Center, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 12-2799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Steven Rann v. Donald Hulick
as 11-3502
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN R. RANN
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden
Hayes v. Walker et al
as 1:2011cv01329
Plaintiff:
Larry Charbert Hayes
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Sherry Hile, Donald A Hulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saeed Younger v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 11-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAEED YOUNGER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, U. REES, Shift Supervisor, JODI SUHRE and others
Howard v. Hulick
as 3:2011cv00244
Petitioner:
Christopher J Howard
Respondent:
Donald A. Hulick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lester Dobbey v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 11-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER DOBBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and TYRONE MURRAY
Gregory Turley v. Dave Rednour, et al
as 11-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY J. TURLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE REDNOUR, MICHAEL P. RANDLE, DANNY HARTLINE and others
Thomas Von Ryburn v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 11-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS VON RYBURN
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, Retired Warden and Chief Administrative Officer, LIEUTENANT ASHBY, Internal Affairs, CRAIG S. MITCHELL, Lieutenant Adjustment Committee Chairperson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
