Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Banko v. Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Matthew Banko
Defendant:
Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company, Donald Orval Shaw, Unknown Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States v. Donald Shaw
as 23-2169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald L. Shaw
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHAW SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23568
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD DARNELL SHAW SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Shaw v. Justin Hammers
as 20-1179
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD A. SHAW
Respondent / Appellee:
JUSTIN HAMMERS, Warden, Illinois River Correctional Center
SHAW v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv02888
Plaintiff:
DONALD B. SHAW
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Hammers et al
as 1:2017cv03948
Petitioner:
Donald A Shaw
Respondent:
Justin Hammers and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller et al v. Medium Security Institute (MSI) et al
as 4:2014cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miller, Steven Dunn, Tyrone Williams and others
Defendant:
Medium Security Institute (MSI), Ronald Glass, Pat Schommer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. THE BOROUGH OF GREENVILLE et al
as 2:2013cv01268
Plaintiff:
NANCY LITTLE
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF GREENVILLE, BRIAN W. SHIPLEY, PAMELA S. AUCHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2011ct03108
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Shaw
Defendant:
D. Gonzales, Ramsey, J. Garrido and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
