Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Patent Armory Inc. v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stewart v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Carla Stewart
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Proszak et al v. Doordash, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prozak and Leonardo Leiva Rivera
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc., Sarah Ambrose, Matthew Faul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Saunier v. Odom et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Kathy Saunier
Defendant:
Alexus Odom, Doordash, Inc., Assurant Insurance Agency, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Omnity Consulting, LLC v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Omnity Consulting, LLC dba Harlem Shake (West 124th Street) and Omnity Consulting, LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Harlem Shake (West 124th Street)
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Mims et al v. Kalakau et al
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Delron Mims and Shareef Brown
Defendant:
Shentel Kalakau and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nikolic v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Milan Nikolic
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Monroe v. Doordash, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv06002
Plaintiff:
Stormy K Monroe
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc. and Papy Kenedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
WirelessWerx IP, LLC
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Karout v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06148
Plaintiff:
Sharbell Karout
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
