Cases 111 - 120 of 816
Franklin v. Schriro et al
as 1:2013cv03973
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leroy Franklin
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Canty, Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Schriro et al
as 7:2013cv03973
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leroy Franklin
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Canty, Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Schriro et al
as 1:2013cv03964
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leroy Franklin
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, John Doe, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassell v. 44th Precinct 2 East 169th Street et al
as 1:2013cv03831
Plaintiff:
James Cassell
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howze v. Bell et al
as 1:2013cv03824
Plaintiff:
Richard Howze
Defendant:
Bell, Dora B. Schriro, Louis Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howze v. Schriro et al
as 1:2013cv03822
Plaintiff:
Richard Howze
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Himraj, Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03810
Plaintiff:
Roy Parker
Defendant:
The City of New York, Dora Schriro, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howze v. Schriro et al
as 1:2013cv03505
Plaintiff:
Richard Howze
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Himraj, Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Trifilio v. City of New York
as 13-1235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank Trifilio
Defendant:
John Doe, Corizon Health Services Manager AMKC and Governor Cuomo
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Dora B. Schriro, Mayor Bloomberg and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
