Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Stapleton v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv00514
Defendant:
Lisette Camilo, Department of Correction, Joseph Ponte and others
Plaintiff:
Kadar Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Skrine v. Schriro et al
as 1:2015cv00415
Plaintiff:
Skrine and Armand Skrine
Defendant:
Schriro, Dr. Dora B. Schriro, Lewis Finkelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nelson v. Thompson et al
as 1:2014cv03414
Defendant:
Thomas Hall, Dora B. Schriro and Kenneth P. Thompson
Plaintiff:
Deric Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Schriro et al
as 1:2014cv02670
Defendant:
Boyd, Mr. Brown, Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Hynes et al
as 1:2014cv00603
Respondent:
Charles J. Hynes, Dora B. Schriro and Warden
Petitioner:
Deric Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hillard v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07133
Defendant:
City of New York, Correction Officer John Doe, Captain Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Livingston v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05782
Defendant:
Chief of Department Philip Banks, III, City of New York, Corrections Officer Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Hynes et al
as 1:2012cv04913
Respondent:
Thomas Hall, Charles J. Hynes and Dora B. Schriro
Petitioner:
Deric Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
