Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Taylor v. Swift et al
as 1:2012cv05623
Defendant:
CO Ballart, CO Benbow, CO Call and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youmans v. Schiro et al
as 1:2012cv03690
Plaintiff:
Richard Youmans
Defendant:
Dora Schiro, New York City, Michael Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond Rigsby v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-15334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND EARL RIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, JANET NAPOLITANO, JANICE K. BREWER and others
Fountain v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07538
Plaintiff:
Albert Fountain
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora Schiro, Larry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan Stein v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 10-16527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN STEIN, AKA Allen Stein
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES RYAN, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections, MAGGIE URENA, Arizona Time Computation Unit Supervisor, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Helton v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv02300
Petitioner:
Stephen M. Helton
Respondent:
Dora Schiro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Schiro et al
as 2:2008cv01465
Plaintiff:
James Herjan Jones
Defendant:
Dora Schiro, R Sanchez, Covarrubias and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
D. v. Schiro
as 2:2007cv02029
Defendant:
Dora Schiro
Plaintiff:
John D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mutab v. Schiro et al
as 2:2007cv01415
Petitioner:
Kathoum Mutab
Respondent:
Dora Schiro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Schiro et al
as 2:2007cv01157
Petitioner:
Mark Philip Sullivan
Respondent:
Dora Schiro, Bartos and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
