Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-60156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cymeyolvv Hill v. Natural Vision Medical Group et al
as 2:2021cv05858
Plaintiff:
Cymeyolvv Hill
Defendant:
Natural Vision Medical Group and Dr Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Mee et al
as 1:2020cv00110
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti and Grandinette
Defendant:
Patricia Sells, Wesley Mun, Dr. Roberto Sebastian and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Hegmann et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
HSA Erica N. Barajas, Dr. Sabastian, PHSD Patricia Sells and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Anderson et al
as 1:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Edmund Hyun, Chief Susan Ballard, Dr. Bruce S. Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
