Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Miller v. Aileek et al
as 6:2023cv06125
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Miller
Defendant:
Aileek, Dr. Lee, Kristy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thomas v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Thomas
Defendant:
B. M. Antonelli, United States of America, Christy Matthew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dao v. Mr. Harold, et al
as 7:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Dean Lee Dao, Jr.
Defendant:
Pocahontas State Correctional Center, Mr. Harold, Nurse Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE et al
as 2:2022cv04788
Plaintiff:
MINDY COHEN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, HINTZE, BENDUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crayton v. Bockhorn et al
as 3:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Chris Bockhorn, Joni Fisher and Dr. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansell v. Segal et al
as 1:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Danae Mansell
Respondent:
Michael Segal, Jeff Frank, Dr Lee Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ford et al v. Nassau University Medical Center et al
as 2:2021cv06710
Plaintiff:
Gary Ford
Defendant:
Nassau University Medical Center, Dr. Grace Ting/MD, Dr. Mathew Reifler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sammy Thomas v. Dr. Lee et al
as 2:2021cv08510
Plaintiff:
Sammy Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Lee and C.M.E. Brite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv01037
Plaintiff:
Chloe Barr
Defendant:
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson, Dr. Lee McElroy, Dr. Leslie Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eubanks v. Ms. Bishop et al
as 4:2021cv01879
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Dr. Lianette Linthicum, Senior Warden Boscoe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
