Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Olajuwon Smith v. Charles Liggett, et al
as 21-3156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Olajuwon Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Liggett, also known as Leggitt, Dream Young, Health Care Administrator, CCS, Correct Care Solutions Company and others
Muhammad v. Monroe et al
as 6:2021cv06096
Defendant:
Nurse Wilson, Ms. Shiah Don, Nurse Monroe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Hurlbut v. Faust, et al
as 19-2550
Defendant / Appellee:
Hearing Officer Justine Minor, Classification Admin Hosman, ORCU, Securus Technologies, Inc., Phone Contractor for the ADC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Daniel Hurlbut v. Faust, et al
as 19-2212
Defendant / Appellee:
Hearing Officer Justine Minor, Sergeantt Robert Hutcheson, ORCU, Classification Admin Hosman, ORCU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Hurlbut v. Faust et al
as 6:2018cv06087
Defendant:
Officer Merritt, Warden Faust, Securus Phone Technologies and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Kellogg
as 6:2014cv06152
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Kimberly Kellogg, Dream Young and R Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Hobbs et al
as 6:2012cv06027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stevens
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Reed, David Robert Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Kelly et al
as 6:2012cv06024
Plaintiff:
Michael Vernon James
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Liggett and Dream Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Hobbs et al
as 4:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stevens
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Reed, David Robert Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wray v. Correctional Medical Services
as 6:2009cv06071
Plaintiff:
Chalmers Wray
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Bhalravi Kharod, Jones Eye Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
