Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Neven et al
as 3:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Mr. Baca, Loeman Church, Greg Cox and others
Unknown:
A Wayne Carter, Martin I. Melendrez, Robert Simon and others
702) 386-1946 (fax:
Raelene K. Palmer, Raelene K. Palmer, Raelene K. Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Calderwood et al
as 2:2013cv02080
Defendant:
CCS1 Amy Calderwood, Director James G. Cox, CCS2 Roland Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Sawyer v. Morrow Cole, et al
as 13-15127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK SAWYER
Defendant - Appellee:
MORROW COLE, GREG COX, DUANE GRAHAM and others
Narviez Alexander v. Duane Graham, et al
as 13-15045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NARVIEZ V. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
DUANE GRAHAM, JOSEPH HANSON and BEEBE CLARK
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 12-16571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
Alexander v. State Of Nevada et al
as 3:2010cv00429
Plaintiff:
Narviez V. Alexander
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Renee Baker, Debra Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 08-17677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 08-16420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
NOT USED
as 2:2007cv01086
Defendant:
Neven, Baca, Cole Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Neven et al
as 2:2007cv01088
Defendant:
Mr. Baca, Loeman Church, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
