Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Harris et al v. Elutia Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 4:24-CV-35-M-BM.
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Lisa Harris and Oral Duane Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Elutia Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris et al v. Elutia Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Lisa Harris and Oral Duane Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Elutia Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Gary Harris
as 23-5187
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY DUANE HARRIS
Harris v. Brady, et al
as 23-1026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL D. HARRIS, AKA Darrell Duane Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BRADY, THE CITY OF AURORA, JOHN MORELAND and others
Leggett v. Mac Haik Ford, Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00789
Plaintiff:
Terry Leggett
Defendant:
Mac Haik Ford, Ltd. doing business as Austin Mac Haik Ford Lincoln Mercury and Duane Harris
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Gary Harris v. USA
as 21-5040
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY DUANE HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05852
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Berry et al
as 1:2019cv01880
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Duane Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Palmer, Officer M. Berry and City of Smyrna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Stapp et al
as 1:2019cv01035
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Peter J. Stapp, Heather Tsongoten and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell-Duane Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. USA
as 5:2019cv00046
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary Duane Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
