Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pineville Firefighters Local 1384 et al v. Pineville
as 1:2020cv01111
Plaintiff:
Mark Warren, Richerd Deen, Joshua Bordelon and others
Defendant:
City of Pineville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
TEAL v. SPEARS
as 4:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
ERIC LAMONT TEAL
Defendant:
DUANE SPEARS, JOHN DOE, MARY PLISKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STALLWORTH v. BUSS
as 4:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DONTAVIOUS STALLWORTH
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, S TYSON, MATHERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. MCNEIL
as 4:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
RAY JAMES
Defendant:
MCNEIL, DUANE SPEARS, BLANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 8:2011cv00640
Petitioner:
Ray James
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Duane Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2011cv00103
Petitioner:
RAY JAMES
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
DUANE SPEARS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANCHEZ v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS SANCHEZ
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUANE SPEARS and MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAFAVORS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
HENRY J LAFAVORS
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUANE SPEARS and JOYCE SWAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. PAULCIN et al
as 4:2010cv00483
Defendant:
PROPHET PAULCIN , DUANE SPEARS, KENNETH PAYNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewoynne Warren v. Nan Jeffcoat, et al
as 10-12802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EWOYNNE WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
NAN JEFFCOAT, Assistant Warden Tarlor Correctional Institution, CATHY SIMCOX, Director of Medical Taylor Correctional Institution, STANLEY DRATLER, Dr. Chief Health Officer Tayor Correctional Institution and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
