Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kleiber v. Shnell et al
as 0:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Kleiber
Defendant:
Paul Shnell, MN Department of Corrections and City of Duluth - City Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldberg et al v. City of Duluth and its Policy Department
as 0:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
Patricia Goldberg and Ryan Goldberg
Defendant:
Duluth, City of and its Policy Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Richard Carlson v. Becky Dooly, et al
as 14-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David R. Carlson
Defendant - Appellee:
Becky Dooly, Warden, Susan Ginsburg, Attorney, Fred Fredman, Duluth Public Defenders Office and others
Heglund et al v. Aitkin County et al
as 0:2014cv00296
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rae Heglund and Jamie Lee Heglund
Defendant:
Aitkin County , Aitkin, City of , Babbitt, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kendall v. Albert Lea, City of et al
as 0:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Alix Kendall
Defendant:
Albert Lea, City of , Annandale, City of , Anoka County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roschen et al v. Wabasha County et al
as 0:2013cv02490
Plaintiff:
Debra Roschen , James Roschen , Megan Roschen and others
Defendant:
Wabasha County , Anoka County , Anoka County Community Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loeffler v. Anoka, City of et al
as 0:2013cv02060
Plaintiff:
Jennie Marie Loeffler
Defendant:
Anoka, City of , Burnsville, City of , Dakota County and others
Carl v. Duluth, City of
as 0:2012cv02046
Plaintiff:
Anthony Carl
Defendant:
Duluth, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jankowski et al v. Duluth, City of et al
as 0:2011cv03392
Plaintiff:
Steve Jankowski and Peter Scott
Defendant:
Duluth, City of and Jim Nilsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacross v. Duluth, City of et al
as 0:2010cv03922
Plaintiff:
Miles Lacross
Defendant:
Duluth, City of, Anton Marc, Fogerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
