Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Tabor v. Bickham et al
as 3:2022cv01028
Petitioner:
Tony Joseph Tabor
Respondent:
Dustin Bickham and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Bickham
as 2:2022cv04345
Plaintiff:
Desmond Charles Parker
Defendant:
Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bickham
as 22-30628
Petitioner / Appellant:
David A. Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Dustin Bickham and Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim, Sr.
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham, Patricia Williams, Stephanie Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 3:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Defendant:
Edward Dustin Bickham and Robin D. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Bickham
as 1:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wayne Ross
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Bickham et al
as 2:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Darrell Taylor
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 2:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Defendant:
Edward Dustin Bickham and Robin D. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Edwards et al
as 3:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Timothy Washington
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, James LeBlanc, Jason Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creighton v. Medical Head Dixon Correctional Institute et al
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Creighton
Defendant:
Medical Head Dixon Correctional Institute, Dustin Bickham and James M LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
