Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Higgins v. Trueline Infrastructure Solutions, LLC
as 1:2025cv00238
Plaintiff:
Dusty James Higgins
Defendant:
Trueline Infrastructure Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
The United States of America ex rel, @ Real Republican Party et al
as 2:2021cv00706
Petitioner:
The United States of America ex rel, @ Real Republican Party, County Congress of Florida, Charlotte County Congress and others
Intervenor:
Dusty James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Grote
as 2:2017cv02500
Plaintiff:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant:
Stewart Grote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dusty Cox v. Mark Pearson, et al
as 16-4450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Pearson, Dr., Wade Jordan, Dr. and Gregory Daus, Dr.
Dusty Cox v. Mark Pearson, et al
as 16-4307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Pearson, Dr., Harrell Watts, National Inmate Appeals Administrator, A. W. Medina, Associate Warden of Health Services and others
Johnson v. The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company et al
as 4:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Greg Johnson
Defendant:
The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company and Dusty James Nice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. USA
as 4:2015cv00959
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dusty James Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cox v. Pearson et al
as 6:2015cv03452
Plaintiff:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant:
Mark Pearson, Wade Jordan and Gregory Daus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. Grote et al
as 5:2015cv03189
Plaintiff:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant:
Stewart Grote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cox v. Pearson et al
as 6:2014cv03159
Plaintiff:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant:
Mark Pearson, Harrell Watts, A W Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
