Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00018
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Paul Dwayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv10103
Plaintiff:
Sheldy Smith and Mary Rowan
Defendant:
Dwayne Jones, City of Detroit and Stacey Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv02601
Claimant:
House of Wings dba Dominic's House of Wings and Dominic Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Eight Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($8,200.00) in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Brown v. City of New Rochelle et al
as 1:2018cv04119
Plaintiff:
Mark P. Brown
Defendant:
City of New Rochelle, Dwayne Jones, Christopher Guglielmo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Chappius
as 1:2017cv04064
Respondent:
P. Chappius, Jr.
Petitioner:
Dwayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Chappius
as 9:2017cv00586
Petitioner:
Dwayne Jones
Respondent:
P. Chappius, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arceneaux et al v. Fitness Connection Option Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
Wesley Arceneaux , Samuel Barnhardt , Adam Bellinger and others
Defendant:
Fitness Connection Option Holdings, LLC, Titan Fitness, LLC, Titan Fitness Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07755
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Davis et al
as 2:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, David Gutierrez and Dale Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
