Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Medical City of Denton et al
as 4:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Stevie Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Medical City of Denton, Dr. Robert Connaughton, Dr. Travis K Lilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jackson et al
as 9:2021cv00286
Plaintiff:
Clifford Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Billy Jackson, Daniel D Dickerson, Gene Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Arceneaux et al v. Fitness Connection Option Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
Wesley Arceneaux , Samuel Barnhardt , Adam Bellinger and others
Defendant:
Fitness Connection Option Holdings, LLC, Titan Fitness, LLC, Titan Fitness Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Davis et al
as 2:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, David Gutierrez and Dale Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv03478
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Dwayne Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jones v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv03673
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Dwayne Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Officer M. Marsh et al
as 4:2013cv03672
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Dwayne Jones
Respondent:
Officer M. Marsh, Houston Police Department and Harris County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ginsel et al
as 9:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Clifford Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Cody Ginsel, G Hunter, Gary L Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Currie et al
as 9:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Clifford Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Gary L Currie, Cody Ginsel, Steve Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ginsel et al
as 9:2010cv00167
Plaintiff:
Clifford Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Cody Ginsel, Gary L Currie, Steven T Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
