Cases 1 - 10 of 260
DUNNIGAN v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2023cv02266
Plaintiff:
PETHROD DUNNIGAN
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID E. ORTIZ and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
The Estate of Victor E. Ortiz v. Bronx Harbor Health Care Complex, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09348
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF VICTOR E. ORTIZ, a and Victor Eduardo Ortiz
Defendant:
BRONX HARBOR HEALTH CARE COMPLEX, INC. doing business as d/b/a KINGS HARBOR MULTICARE CENTER, ABC Corporation, ABC Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 mm Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
LACKNER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2022cv04951
Plaintiff:
JON J. LACKNER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KRIVOI v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv20401
Petitioner:
MARK KRIVOI
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PINSKY v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv20375
Petitioner:
ROBERT PINSKY
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BLOOM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv20055
Plaintiff:
IRA BLOOM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Bradford v. P. Bracamonte, et al
as 21-56087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
P. BRACAMONTE, Facility C Captain, W. SMITH, Correctional Lieutenant, L. STEEL, Correctional Officer and others
BONDS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv17185
Petitioner:
FREDERICK B. BONDS, JR.
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FAULKNER v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv17192
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER FAULKNER
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALMBERG v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv16684
Petitioner:
THOMAS WALTER ALMBERG
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
