Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Benavides et al v. Caroline Unisex Beauty Spa & Barber Shop Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02859
Plaintiff:
Gloria Benavides, Maria Duta and Julio Granda
Defendant:
Caroline Unisex Beauty Spa & Barber Shop Corp., Mauro D. Ortiz and Mauro E. Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
The Estate of Victor E. Ortiz v. Bronx Harbor Health Care Complex, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09348
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF VICTOR E. ORTIZ, a and Victor Eduardo Ortiz
Defendant:
BRONX HARBOR HEALTH CARE COMPLEX, INC. doing business as d/b/a KINGS HARBOR MULTICARE CENTER, ABC Corporation, ABC Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 mm Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Ortiz v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03244
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Ortiz
Defendant:
City of New York and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Martucello
as 1:2016cv07927
Petitioner:
Jose E. Ortiz
Respondent:
Daniel Martucello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. Artus
as 1:2015cv05632
Petitioner:
Jose E. Ortiz
Respondent:
Michael Artus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ortiz v. Rabsatt
as 1:2011cv01377
Petitioner:
Jose E. Ortiz
Respondent:
Calvin O. Rabsatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. State Of New York
as 1:2011cv01165
Petitioner:
Jose E. Ortiz
Respondent:
State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2010cv09434
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Ortiz
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg , John C. Liv , Current Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2010cv03887
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Ortiz
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, William C. Thompson, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
