Cases 1 - 10 of 221
Watson v. Wolpert
as 6:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Christopher M. Wolpert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Saxton
as 24-40223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Rhodes
Defendant:
Garrett Saxton, Practice Manager, Rachel Burleson, Facility Nurse Manager, Tonia G. McNaughton, Nurse Practitioner and others
Watson v. Leclerc et al
as 6:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Jessica Lee Leclerc and United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watson v. Boch et al
as 6:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Gerald W. Boch and United States Department of Veterans Affairs, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watson v. Ebert, et al
as 24-3007
Plaintiff:
CARL E. WATSON
Defendant:
SHERYL A. EBERT and VETERANS EVALUATION SERVICES
WATSON v. HARRIS
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
TODD E WATSON
Respondent:
SHEVAUN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Optum Headquarters et al
as 6:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Optum Headquarters, Heather Ciafrocco, Christ Zaetta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watson v. Secretary, Department Of Corrections (Broward County)
as 1:2023cv24895
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Secretary, Department Of Corrections (Broward County)
as 8:2023cv02915
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Defendant:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. DOVA
as 23-3221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL E. WATSON, I and CARL E. WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
