Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WATSON v. HARRIS
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
TODD E WATSON
Respondent:
SHEVAUN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Secretary, Department Of Corrections (Broward County)
as 1:2023cv24895
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Secretary, Department Of Corrections (Broward County)
as 8:2023cv02915
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Defendant:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17302
Plaintiff:
BRIAN E WATSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 0:2021cv62377
Plaintiff:
Eucal E Watson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Lesly Cayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Watson v. Bloom et al
as 0:2021cv60192
Defendant:
Judge Peter T. Fay, Jill Pryor, William Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20740
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00762
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP E WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2019cv61639
Defendant:
Sandi Digiamo, George Anthony, William Steers and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Lambert et al
as 0:2017cv61368
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Defendant:
Al Lambert, John Lewis, Robert Resnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
