Cases 1 - 10 of 50
LaHue et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Vonnah Lee LaHue and Robert Asah LaHue
Defendant:
Diane K. Smith, Steven Robert Anderson, Charles Droege and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kessman v. Smith, et al
as 22-1390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY C. KESSMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN E. SMITH, the Sheriff, SHAFFER, Lt., BALKEMA and others
Cruz Montoya v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv02625
Plaintiff:
James John Cruz Montoya
Defendant:
Justin E. Smith, Joshua Taylor and Deputy Deputy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kessman v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01859
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Kessman
Defendant:
Justin E. Smith, Shaffer, Balkema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessman v. Smith, et al
as 22-1214
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY C. KESSMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
JUSTIN E. SMITH, L.C.S.O. Administration, PHIL WISER, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, and 9 other Does and ROBERTS, Loveland Police Dept.
Kessman v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Kessman
Defendant:
Matthew Roberts, City of Loveland Police Dept., Smoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessman v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Kessman
Defendant:
Matthew Roberts, Loveland Police Dept., Balkema and others
Respondent:
Justin E Smith, Moll, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Robert E Smith
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00018
Petitioner:
Robert E Smith
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
