Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kasie E. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Yost et al
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jacques E. Smith
Defendant:
David Yost, Hon. Judge Richard P. Ferenc, Hon. Judge Charles L. Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith et al v. American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
as 2:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
David E. Smith and Sigrid Smith
Defendant:
American Red Cross of East Central Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Parr v. Smith's Home Improvement & Repair, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01597
Plaintiff:
Zoey Parr
Defendant:
Smith's Home Improvement & Repair, LLC and Brian E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv02373
Plaintiff:
Melanie E. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02488
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Smith and Holly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
Mary E Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 1:2020cv00904
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05915
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05830
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
