Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
GOLDSBOROUGH v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72106
Plaintiff: DIANA GOLDSBOROUGH
Defendant: A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BROWN v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72101
Plaintiff: ALVESTER BROWN
Defendant: A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
DICKERSON v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72105
Plaintiff: PAUL DICKERSON
Defendant: A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
CHANDLER v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72103
Plaintiff: DONALD CHANDLER
Defendant: A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BURNETTE v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72102
Plaintiff: CONWAY H. BURNETTE
Defendant: A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
COBB v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72104
Plaintiff: THOMAS D. COBB, SR.
Defendant: A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
JOHNSON v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72107
Plaintiff: GEORGE JOHNSON
Defendant: A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Tyeisha Hansley, etc. v. E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc., et al.
as MD/1:08-CV-02282
Plaintiff: Tyeisha Hansley, etc.
Defendant: E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc
Wooden v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02732
Plaintiff: Donald Wooden, Jr.
Defendant: John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
MCCURDY et al v. JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv76815
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. MCCURDY, MICHAEL J. MCCURDY and ANNA MCCURDY
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., E.L. STEBBING & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?