Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MCLEOD v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00324
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, CORIZON HEALTH, CHATELIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dallas et al
as 3:2017cv01463
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee Taylor
Defendant:
John Dallas, Ebony Harvey, K. Luther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Toni Bowden, Ebony Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., William Neil, Charlie Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01152
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Dr. N. Torres, T. Bowden and others
Plaintiff:
Oberist Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAFFNEY v. CORIZON HEALTH INC
as 4:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY R GAFFNEY
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC , JULIE L JONES, EBONY HARVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. SOLORZANO et al
as 1:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
DONNIE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
SOLORZANO, PITTMAN, EBONY HARVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. CORIZON HEALTH INC
as 4:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, JULIE JONES, MICHAEL CREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. JONES
as 4:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, MICHAEL CREWS, CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'AMICO v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC et al
as 4:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
STEVEN F D'AMICO
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VERNON MONTOYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
